Page 7 - Europa-ERPA-N2
P. 7

ENCOUNTER

EUROPOL, Eisenhowerlaan, The Hague, the         English speaking countries which have         1970-90                                           ENCOUNTER
Netherlands (Source EUROPOL)                    accepted it. This has reinforced the esprit
                                                de corps5 of some 850 EUROPOL staff and         Trevi informal group of Interior Ministers      5
The democratic dimension:                       has consolidated a shared culture at the
accountability, efficiency and                  service of security of member states and      1991
single language                                 their citizens.
                                                                                                Institutionalisation of police cooperation
While developing its powerful networks and      Today's challenges: CEPOL, EC3                  modelled on the FBI
personnel, EUROPOL is involved ever more        and ARCHIMEDES
effectively in cooperation between member                                                     1992
states, and European citizens may seek          The European Union established a European
accountability from the agency. The             Police College (CEPOL), which became an         Maastricht Treaty: JHA (Justice and Home
institutional framework has evolved             EU agency in 20056 to provide training in       Affairs) became one of the three pillars of
together with the institution itself4. In 2014  police cooperation in the fight against         the European Communities and Article K1
EUROPOL became accountable to the               organised crime and terrorism. CEPOL, now       refers to EUROPOL
Parliament and the European Council. The        based in Hungary, also encourages the
terms of appointment of the director of the     sharing of knowledge and best practices to    1993
agency in particular should be specified.       develop a common European culture,
                                                particularly in terms of security and           Establishment of the European Anti-Drugs
Like other EU institutions, EUROPOL is          maintaining public order.                       Unit and decision to locate EUROPOL in The
facing severe budget restrictions and                                                           Hague
responds with a constant arbitration of         Since 2012, EUROPOL has hosted the
efficiency/quality of service, with an          European Cybercrime Centre, or EC37. Its      1997
additional dimension of risk to be              first report, 2014 iOCTA, analyses the
considered. Despite an increase in activity,    threats of organised crime8 through the         Treaty of Amsterdam: Community
internal efforts have enabled a 20%             internet or cyber crime against governments     cooperation on justice and police (Article K2)
reduction in management costs. And in a         and administrations, businesses and
somewhat paradoxical way, IT and security       citizens.                                     1998
services have been outsourced. The search
for balance between quality and cost poses      Two years after the meeting in The Hague,       Official opening of EUROPOL: centre of
a real challenge.                               the operation ARCHIMEDES9 between 15 and        excellence for cooperation in intelligence
                                                23 September 2014 was used to measure           and analysis against international crime
Rob Wainwright points out that the choice       the power of EUROPOL in cooperation with
of English as EUROPOL's only language - to      EUROJUST and INTERPOL: 34 participating       1999
the contrary of the European multi-lingual      countries, more than 300 actions at 260
practice, was madefor operational               locations, with 1,150 individuals arrested,     Tampere summit - creation of joint
efficiency reasons, before his arrival and      the largest international police operation      investigation teams
without the influence of the UK Government.     ever implemented in Europe - with Rob
The urgency of crisis situations and the        Wrainwright being rather high-profile in the  2000
need for direct and fast communication          media.
without a risk of distortion or time limits     A beautiful image of Europe working             The Paris Vision: prioritisation of EUROPOL
due to translations made states opt for a       together for the safety of its citizens!
single working language. The director                                                         2000-09
emphasises the remarkable effort of non-         EUROPOL in figures
                                                 and dates(10)                                  Design and growth of EUROPOL's information
                                                 • 850 people, 28 member                        system
                                                 states plus partners
                                                 representing 36 nationalities,               2001
                                                 with an international network
                                                 of 160 liaison officers                        Establishment of contact networks on
                                                 • a budget of almost EUR 85                    specialised topics
                                                 million in 2014
                                                                                              2002-04

                                                                                                Creation of EUROJUST and signing of an
                                                                                                agreement with EUROPOL

                                                                                              2004

                                                                                                Creating mobile offices for large events,
                                                                                                Athens Olympic Games

                                                                                              2006

                                                                                                1st annual OCTA report on assessment of
                                                                                                international crime threats

                                                                                              2007

                                                                                                New EUROPOL strategy, joint EUROPOL -
                                                                                                EUROJUST teams

                                                                                              6/4/2009

                                                                                                Council Decision establishing EUROPOL,
                                                                                                appointment of the Director, Rob Wainwright

(6) Collège Européen de Police (CEPOL) https://www.cepol.europa.eu/who-we-are/european-police-college/about-us et
https://www.cepol.europa.eu/fr, Council Decision 2005/681/JHA of 20 September 2005.
(7) European Cyber-Crime Centre (EC3), https://www.europol.europa.eu/ec3
(8) IOCTA, The Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (iOCTA), 2014
https://www.europol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publications/europol_iocta_web.pdf
(9) https://www.europol.europa.eu/content/operation-archimedes
(10) https://www.europol.europa.eu/category/publication-category/public-documents and the report on the 2011 activities in French
https://www.europol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publications/fr_europolreviewfrench.pdf, Senate Report N° 477 du 17/4/2014 (45 pages),
http://www.senat.fr/notice-rapport/2013/r13-477-notice.html

                                                EUROPEAN REVIEW ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION - N°2 - MARCH 2016
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12